1 ! 1.PLANETA S.A.
(01:14) Carleton Brown Broker Commodity \u0026lt;\u0026lt;Adverse catástrofes, wars are good for commodity markets primas>>.
\u0026lt;\u0026lt;... When the U.S. bombing of Iraq on oil prices pass $ 13 to $ 40 a barrel, of course, no wonder we were hoping that bombs fell on Saddam Huseim.>>
\u0026lt;\u0026lt;The disasters bring Opportunities>>
A tragic event as 11-S was a good deal for those who had gold and sold it, doubled its profits. Keep in mind that customers who speaks Brown are the same 4% to Chomsky referred to above, that it controlled 80% of the shares.
2.The boundary problems
 |
| Jeremy Rifkin |
(04:30) Jeremy Rifkin Foundation on Economic Trends (foetida) \u0026lt;\u0026lt;La people it belongs to tierra>>
E n the transition from medieval to modern times in England, is the phenomenon of The Enclosures, land is divided and becomes private property. Psychologically change "belong to the earth" to "that land belongs to you" environment that will lose respect and they end up being merely an exploitable commodity. This extends to the ocean and atmosphere .
 |
| Elaine Bernard |
(06:05) Director Elaine Bernard of Harvard University Trade Union Program \u0026lt;\u0026lt;With the deregulation, privatization and free trade is what we have in another subdivision, or if you prefer other privatization common goods (...) is interesting in the concept of "who creates the wealth", wealth is created only when it has privately ...>>
 |
| Mark Kingwell |
(6:37) Mark Kingwell philosopher \u0026lt;\u0026lt;... I think there are things you should not play with the public trust by risking only get a small marginal gains in efficiency that might not happen.>>
(08:00) Noam Chomsky Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) " Chomsky believes that public institutions do not aim at profit can maintain their personal well during periods of rescission. And advantage of the flexibility of public sector performance and have no place in the model of economic thought. "
 |
| Maude Barlow |
(09:19) Chair Maude Barlow Council of Canadians
"Some people think that someday ALL be owned by a single person. "
(10:08) Michael Walker \u0026lt;\u0026lt;... seems to be a supporter of privatizing every square inch of the planet? (Interviewer Question ) Of course every cubic centimeter of air, water.>>
Privatization means that you take a public institution and give it a tyrant who exploited her. Although the contrary opinion is stressing the idea of \u200b\u200bthe invisible hand, ie corporations that have every part of the world will protect you for naked self-interest will lead to the society. But the evidence tells us otherwise.
3.LA growing corporation
3
 | Susan Linn
(12:43) Susan Linn Baker Children's Center of Harvard University \u0026lt;\u0026lt;Not that the products whether good or bad, is the idea of \u200b\u200bmanipulating the children to buy products (...) a family can not cope with an industry that spends 12. € 000 000 a year trying to win over their children.>>
 |
| Lucy Hughes |
(13:05) Vice President Lucy Hughes Initiative Media \u0026lt;\u0026lt;... Dar the can is the key, from 20% to 40% of purchases had not been made if the child can not have given her parents (...) You can manipulate consumers to want, so to buy their products (...) whether it is ethical not I know, our role in Initiative is to sell products and if we succeed we have done our job.>>
Children are now the target of a whole range of corporations, as they are where they direct their entire marketing strategy, being vulnerable minds and potential buyers of the future. In this situation the parents are unable to educate their children outside this society as consumer.
(17:20 ) Mark Kinrwell Philosopher " All corporations give people a social function within society. Corporations give us a number of requirements to fulfill the role consumer social good. "
(18:27) Noam Chomsky Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) "The corporate strategy for consumers is to make them completely mechanical consumer products do not need."
\u0026lt;\u0026lt;
(22:40) Mark Barry Competitive Intelligence Professional \u0026lt;\u0026lt;We are predators, is a question of jurisdiction, share Market>>
worth noting that corporations are an institution just as important that the Church the army, schools, and to give its members social functions.
for large shareholders really irrelevant the fact that their workers are good or bad people, or the means they use to fill them pockets, so they do are satisfied.
4.
(26:54) Richard Grossman Program Business, Law and Democracy (POCl) \u0026lt;\u0026lt; We've been through decades and decades and decades of propaganda and education we have been taught to think in a certain way>>
 |
| Chis Komisarjevsky |
(27:55) Chris Komisarjevsky President of PR Firm Burson Marsteller \u0026lt;\u0026lt;Cuales are the obstacles to success and how we can use communications to help them achieve their objetivos> >
Corporations spend money trying to look good sometimes useless things when they could give this money to consumers so that they are administered. Exercise this action to make "good things" but hiding the ultimate goal, the tax cut. In conclusion we only see the beautiful facade.
5. CELEBRATION
(33:10) Naomi Klein author of "No Logo, the power of brands" \u0026lt;\u0026lt;The image brand is not advertising, but is the result, the corporations of the future will not create a product, create a brand image>>
By creating a brand image have a backup because if your product is targeted to a particular market segment, such as a child, if you want to create a new product or the same but directed at another public have ensured a greater degree of acceptance that if you had that brand.
6. ROLL THE TRIUMPH OF ADVERTISING
 |
| Jonathan Ressler |
(36:25) Jonathan Ressler of Big Fat Inc. President \u0026lt;\u0026lt;... covered the marketing occurs everywhere (...) where people are communicating each other, if they get it right you do not you find out what is happening ...>>
Perhaps the best source of marketing is that disclosed by ourselves, there are hardly any isolated site of surreptitious advertising. On either side of the street, a restaurant, even in your home receive daily many advertising messages that influence you in your daily intake.
7. PROGRESS AGAINST
(40:15) Jeremy Rifkin (foetid ) \u0026lt;\u0026lt;The patent office makes clear that one can not patent life (...) if allowed to patent a microbe would mean that corporations own life projects without any public discussion or direction by the conference (...) it took the resolution that can patent anything in the world that is alive but a human being completely born>>
a result of the concessions have been given to corporations, it is reaching a point where everything can be patented and that corporations are taking over all this to scope. In the era of biology is divided between those who give it an intrinsic importance to life and therefore choose values \u200b\u200band technology that respect the intrinsic value and others think that life is merely a utility, something commercial. So should we let the market be the arbiter?.
8. ANNEX A TRUE
 |
| Steve Wilson and Jane Akre |
(45:10) Steve Wilson and Jane Akre Investigative Journalists \u0026lt;\u0026lt;With Monsanto I had not realized how effective it could be a corporation to get something on the market (...) had to be experts in their power, the public in its possession and of course administration, that their product was good for them on the market, and they did
Despite having spent much time doing research based on demonstrable facts and the power of a company as influential as Monsanto, could stop the dissemination of this information. Fox, not to lose the benefits that gave Monsanto advertising relented and decided not to provide information, even though they knew it was true, for it does not matter what means they had to use both bribes and threats of dismissal. After a lengthy trial, the judges ruled that falsifying news is not against the law therefore did not give any compensation to the reporters.
0 comments:
Post a Comment