After some corrections and additions to previous post on the main student political groups at the University Assembly candidates, I show a micro analysis of student groups at the faculty level, and what better example to start with our own, the Faculty of Humanities.
This small but illustrative closer look allows us to observe some forms of student organization information that normally circulates in closed circuit or known only at dirigencial of course if the study group more powers the findings would be more rewarding, but time is of the explosive to the writer of these lines, however, which will be observed then also have some surprises.
political groups and the positioning school

box on the left we have We see several interesting things. First, only one of the groups (INDEVI) has managed to integrate on their list of candidates from all schools, while others show gaps in the composition of their lists. Second, that all lists have an average of 2 candidates from the School of Linguistics and Literature (Especially in Linguistics), besides being well known that the list of candidates Alma Mater, from its Most of the school of anthropology and archeology (Especially of Archaeology), these two findings allows us to speculate about where the student disputes the main circulating. And third, looking at the overall picture, we note that the participation of students of History, traditionally the most active in the electoral process, a noticeable decline against participatory development of linguistics and archeology student, perhaps what is not new is the low participation Philosophy students traditionally have little interest in political affairs, which also explains the backwardness and political oblivion of a discipline so important in a university.
Women and the command Aprista
That

However, in general, male participation is still in front of the female majority, a comparative study gathering the same variables over time, would appreciate, if female participation university is growing or if it is just a circumstantial case.
vs Years of study participation

But if we disaggregate the overall picture on their lists will see that while RED and INDEVI concentrate their candidates the last few years (4th and 5th), Force Villarrealina and Alma Mater, the focus in the early years (2nd and 3rd). This information tells us something important, that only two lists are tables showing renewed, while the other two have kept their own people the last two or three years. However, either way, 5 years is very little time to recognize a profile of a group, especially if they disappear or change names every 2 or 3 years.
To account
interesting thing to make these squares is when we come across information not only know the political landscape of our faculty, as well as organizational strengths and weaknesses of the political groups, but leave a important benchmark for future years; future this information will allow us to identify trends and tendencies around the villarrealinos youth participation, of course at the faculty level it does not say much, but I'm sure a work of greater patience and more time available, at macro will shed important light on the subject. Our university is still waiting for his political scientists.
0 comments:
Post a Comment